Email warming up has been a standard practice in the cold email industry for years. The concept is simple: gradually increase your sending volume to build a positive reputation with email service providers before launching full-scale campaigns. But as we move through 2025, with increasingly sophisticated spam filters and AI-powered email security, many are questioning whether traditional warming practices still deliver results. This article examines the current state of email warming, its effectiveness, and whether it remains a necessary step in your cold email strategy.
Email warming up (also called inbox warming or email account warming) is the process of gradually establishing a positive sending reputation for a new email account or domain before sending cold email campaigns at scale. The process typically involves:
The traditional warming approach has two main variants:
Manual warming - Sending emails to real contacts (colleagues, friends, or willing participants) who agree to open, reply to, and positively engage with your messages.
Automated warming - Using specialized tools that connect to networks of other accounts to automatically exchange emails, generate opens and replies, and rescue messages from spam folders.
For years, the conventional advice for warming has been relatively consistent:
This approach was based on the understanding that email providers like Gmail, Outlook, and Yahoo evaluate new senders cautiously and look for patterns of legitimate email behavior before granting good inbox placement.
The email deliverability landscape has evolved significantly in recent years, with several important developments affecting warming practices:
The answer is nuanced and depends on several factors:
There's strong consensus among experts that manual warming with real, relevant contacts continues to provide benefits:
Nick Palasz, Email Deliverability Consultant, notes: "In 2025, manual warming with real contacts who genuinely engage with your content remains one of the most effective ways to establish sender reputation. This approach creates authentic engagement patterns that even the most sophisticated AI filters recognize as legitimate."
The effectiveness of automated warming tools has become increasingly questionable:
A 2025 study by Email Deliverability Insights found that accounts using only automated warming tools saw an average inbox placement rate just 7% higher than completely unwarmed accounts—a much smaller benefit than reported in previous years.
Case Study 1: SaaS Company
A B2B SaaS company tested three identical domains with different warming approaches:
Results after sending identical campaigns of 1,000 emails:
The manually warmed domain significantly outperformed both the unwarmed domain and the automatically warmed domain.
Case Study 2: Marketing Agency
A marketing agency compared results from 20 client domains using automated warming tools in 2023 versus 20 new domains in 2025 using a hybrid approach (limited automated warming plus manual engagement):
The hybrid approach showed significantly better results, suggesting that automated warming alone has become less effective.
Based on current evidence and expert consensus, here are the most effective warming practices for 2025:
The importance of warming varies depending on your specific situation:
Warming is most critical when:
Warming may be less important when:
Email warming hasn't become obsolete in 2025, but its application has evolved. The data suggests that:
Rather than abandoning warming practices entirely, successful email marketers in 2025 are adapting their approach to focus on authentic engagement and relationship building rather than artificial warming metrics.
The most important takeaway is that there are no shortcuts to good deliverability. While proper warming can help establish initial reputation, long-term inbox placement depends on sending relevant, valuable content to properly targeted recipients who genuinely want to engage with your messages.
In the evolving landscape of email deliverability, warming remains one tool in a comprehensive strategy—not a magic solution, but still a valuable step when implemented correctly.